|
The Grapes of Wrath is one of the best accounts of a period in American
history because of it’s accurate portrayal of everyone involved
in the Depression. This book pointed out the evil deeds committed by every
level of society. The actions of the wealthy, and the small business owners
were historically accurate. The portrayal of the Californians toward the
Okies was correct. Even the way Steinbeck showed the ignorance of the
Okies can be viewed as demeaning. All of these things presented in this
book occurred in American history. To censor this book is to deny the
truth of the depression.
John Steinbeck especially showed the evil actions of the wealthy during
the depression. He writes of the horrible way the rich treated the poor,
“The bank isn’t like a man... it’s a monster”.
He uses this to describe the way the wealthy forced the poor off their
land. Steinbeck also writes of the incredible waste of the wealthy. He
describes how the masses starve, and the owners of the land waste it to
turn a profit. He writes, “The works of the roots of the vines,
of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the
saddest, bitterest thing of all.” Steinbeck also writes of the injustice
of how the small business owners take advantage the poor. The used car
salesmen is the best example of this. He writes of how the used car salesmen
use every underhanded trick in the book to turn a profit at the expense
of people that have no where else to turn.
The way Steinbeck handled the treatment of the poor degraded the Californians.
First, Californians didn’t call the poor by name they dehumanized
them by referring to them as Okies. The police in California are one of
the best examples of how discrimination worked in CA. A cop is responsible
for the wrongful imprisonment of Jim Casey and later for his murder.
The way Steinbeck showed the Okies can be seen as discriminatory. Even
thought he sympathized with their plight, he still showed them as ignorant.
The description of the children flushing the toilet for the first time
showed this ignorance. It was also seen with Connie leaving Rose of Sharon.
He shows the unfaithfulness of the poor. Even Tom is shown in a negative
way. At the beginning of the story he is shown leaving prison for murder.
Steinbeck calls to light all of these injustices and in doing so provides
a controversial book. The wealthy want to see the book taken out of schools
because of it’s portrayal of them as a heartless monster. The Californians
are also shown as heartless and even cruel to the migrants. He shows the
conditions and lifestyle of the poor. He manages to anger everyone involved
in the novel.
-Page
2-
|
| ::Please
Help Support the author of this essay by clicking on the links
below:: |
|
 |
|