|
"Revolution" is a good source of accurate information on the
time of the American revolution. This is not to say however that the movie
was well done. The battle scenes in the movie were very historical accurate.
The economic situation of the Americans in the revolutionary times was
also well depicted. The actors, director and composer did a horrible job
on this film.
The movie, "Revolution", was based around the character of Tom
Dobbs played by Al Pacino. He was forced into the Revolutionary War when
his son Ned Dobbs enlisted. Tom soon met with his love interest in the
film Daisy McConnahay. Daisy was a devoted supporter of the revolution.
She was from a rich family that sided with the British and this forced
her from he home. Daisy’s family had wealth whereas Tom had nothing
but his son. Tom and Ned fight in the Revolutionary War. They soon flee
from the army much to the dismay of Daisy. Tom is picked on by a British
officer named Peasy. While Daisy is supplying the American troops she
is attacked by Peasy and Tom watches as she is struck down from afar.
After the war Tom meets with Daisy again and the fall in love. Tom’s
character was fairly well acted by Al Pacino. Ned, however was poorly
cast for his part. The British officer Peasy was the most memorable character
from the movie with his nasal voice. The music from the movie never fit
the images on the screen. The end where Tom is looking for Daisy sounds
wrong for the most tender moment in the film.
This film was very historically accurate. The battle scenes in particular
were accurate. They showed just how disciplined the British army was.
They walked calmly standing up toward and enemy firing upon them. When
the British got close enough to the Americans they locked their bayonets
and charged. This was very accurate of the way the British fought at this
time. The textbook told of how the Americans had almost no knowledge of
fighting. This was backed up by the scene in where Tom cannot attach his
bayonet.
The economics of this film were very well shown. Tom was like many Americans.
He was poor and he went into the war in order to earn a living. Zinn spoke
of this being the reason most men joined the army. Tom’s situation
was shown to be common of many men because he is often shown with the
majority. He is right alongside dozens of other as they argue over what
is owed to them. Tom is also show in the majority when he is shown fighting
with thousands of men in his position when he is fighting. The McConnahay
family is show to be the exception. The are quite a wealthy family. The
father of Daisy is a war profiteer, spoke of in the textbook. The McConnahay’s
a shown the be the minority of the population because they are never show
with other families of there class.
This movie was a very good way to study American history at the time of
the Revolution. The film was very historical accurate throughout the entire
film. My only objection to this movie was the poor quality of actors.
Also, the director never made me care about any of the characters. This
movie is a good way to learn about the American Revolution.
-Page
2-
|
| ::Please
Help Support the author of this essay by clicking on the links
below:: |
|
 |
|